Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency

World War II was pivotal in human history, leaving a profound political and social impact. Its conclusion marked a significant turning point, leading to post-war suburbanization and the baby boom. These phenomena resulted in rapid urban growth and a surge in housing construction, which peaked in the 1960s and continued to flourish throughout the following decades, gradually slowing down until the present day. Currently, we are facing a very different scenario in which a backlog of affordable housing, combined with a challenging economic outlook and a climate agenda, have led to the need for a transformation of the built environment into a cleaner and more resource-efficient one, in line with the Paris Agreement.

Thus, with the ever-increasing demand for housing, combined with policy initiatives such as the European Green Deal, the post-war model of hyper-production is becoming unsustainable. Consequently, refurbishing derelict or redundant buildings has emerged as a viable alternative. Unlike the scheme of demolition and new construction, this approach offers opportunities for energetic retrofitting, which helps mitigate environmental obsolescence, extend the lifespan of buildings, and revitalize the existing and dilapidated stock—including postwar housing—while improving people's quality of life.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 2 of 15
ShowPass Refurbishment / Energiehaus Arquitectos. Image © Pol Viladoms

Refurbishment represents a clear path towards sustainability of the built environment by reducing resource use, maintaining the existing urban footprint, and reducing the need for new development in natural areas. Furthermore, integrating this approach with energy-efficient materials and systems enhances building performance through renovations, resulting in a profoundly positive impact. In this sense, we will delve into projects where Sto solutions have formed the basis for improving the efficiency of buildings.

Preserving Le Corbusier’s Maison Guiette (1926)

This UNESCO World Heritage Site and part of the housing projects where Le Corbusier applied his Five Points of a New Architecture underwent a complete renovation of its exterior envelope. These renovations faced several technical challenges, primarily due to water leaks. As a result, a comprehensive refurbishment of the facade became necessary, with extra attention to details and technical aspects.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 3 of 15
Maison Guiette, Antwerp, Belgium. Image © Left: Courtesy of ADAGP - Maury / Right: ©F.L.C./SABAM Belgium 2023/Victor Robyn
Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 4 of 15
Section and Facade - Maison Guiette. Image © Fondation Le Corbusier / ADAGP

The objective was to create a waterproof, environmentally friendly vapor permeable facade using mineral cladding. Achieving this goal required using an exterior wall insulation system that preserved the project's architectural integrity. The system included fire-retardant and vapor-open properties. Mineral silicate decorative plaster and facade paint finish also play an essential role in maintaining the breathing properties of the facade, which is crucial for the condition and lifespan of the building.

An especially challenging aspect of the process was integrating facade insulation with new concrete elements added to the roof hoods seamlessly. The solution relied on 8 mm thick plaster carrier boards made from mineral raw materials, specifically designed for old or damaged external insulation systems. These boards were integrated into the facade, creating a seamless and watertight connection between the roof edge and the insulation, which proved crucial in enhancing the overall effectiveness and durability of the system.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 5 of 15
Le Corbusier's characteristic rectilinear volume with flush, horizontal windows was subject to mandatory preservations during the renovation of the facade. Image Courtesy of Sto

Overall, the outcome of this project is a significant improvement in the house's efficiency. Improvements of this type must be subtle to the eye to respect the heritage value of the building, thus allowing it to maintain the characteristics and qualities of the original design, which, almost 100 years after its construction, is still relevant.

A New Vision for Housing Projects

Other examples where the facade plays a leading role in the design process include the Salmen House, which demonstrates the use of color as a powerful communication tool, and the Herne Bay Hideaway, notable for its integration into the surroundings. The latter, a 1960s brick and tile house between neighboring homes, had a car-centric entry that disconnected it from the surrounding landscape and views. Addressing this, the design team transformed this residence into a modern dwelling that responds to the context, providing a private urban atmosphere for a young family. The primary architectural strategy included a covered entry courtyard that acts as a bridge to the house, creating a pedestrian-friendly access.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 6 of 15
Herne Bay Hideaway / Lloyd Hartley Architects. Image © David Straight

In terms of materials, a carefully selected palette of natural colors and clean details unite the house, creating a cohesive and timeless design. Notably, cement-free plaster was used for the facade finishes. This plaster is made with an acrylic or silicone resin base, graded aggregates, and water to create a workable thin coating that is extremely flexible yet durable, ideal for exterior applications. As part of Sto's product line, it is available in a wide range of textures and colors that can be combined with anti-crack leveling materials to create complete thermal insulation systems for different facade substrates.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 7 of 15
Salmen House / Office S&M. Image © French + Tye
Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 8 of 15
Section - Salmen House. Image Courtesy of Office S&M

Furthermore, considering strategies geared towards the energy efficiency of buildings and their environmental impact, the ShowPass Refurbishment used a wide variety of low-impact green material solutions to demonstrate and disseminate the viability of technologies that contribute to the decarbonization of buildings. The facade incorporates intelligent technology coatings to protect it against outdoor conditions while revitalizing aesthetics. Additionally, it improves the thermal envelope and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite originating in the last century, this building has increased its architectural value through upgrades to its thermal envelope and strategic design. This preservation maintains its status as part of Barcelona's heritage and enhances it, positively impacting its surroundings. It demonstrates that buildings from the past can integrate with contemporary innovations.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 9 of 15
ShowPass Refurbishment / Energiehaus Arquitectos. Image © Pol Viladoms
Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 10 of 15
Section - ShowPass Refurbishment. Image Courtesy of Energiehaus Arquitectos

Refurbishing for Collective Housing

As the focus extends beyond single-family or small-scale housing, collective housing emerges as a significant challenge on the global agenda. One of the primary obstacles in these projects is the availability of suitable space for development. With cities expanding rapidly, finding adequate space for larger-scale projects becomes increasingly difficult, often relegating them to peripheral areas.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 11 of 15
Filmlageret Community Housing / Spacon & X. Image Courtesy of Spacon & X
Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 12 of 15
Section - Filmlageret Community Housing. Image Courtesy of Spacon & X

However, a practical solution lies in repurposing existing structures originally designed for other purposes, such as buildings intended for manufacturing, offices, or even large warehouses, which can be adapted for habitation. A notable example is Filmlageret Community Housing, a former film warehouse transformed into a mixed-use apartment complex designed to foster community living. Projects like this one serve as examples by not only embracing new housing models but also integrating energy-efficient materials and systems.

A similar case is the refurbishment of Philips-Haus, originally the Austrian headquarters of a multinational company built in the 1960s. The building was renovated to take advantage of its open layout, allowing for various uses like apartments, supermarkets, restaurants, and a future connection to a metro line. Today, it offers more than 100 new apartments distributed over nine floors. This transformation has had a positive impact on its immediate urban environment and provides large-scale benefits, considering the reduced environmental impact compared to the demolition and construction of a new building, which would generate unnecessary carbon emissions.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 13 of 15
Refurbishment Philips-Haus / Josef Weichenberger Architects. Image © Leo Fellinger
Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 14 of 15
Section - Refurbishment Philips-Haus . Image Courtesy of Josef Weichenberger Architects

Wrapping up and considering the strategies employed in each project, the solutions for a new horizon in the built environment can be achieved (most times) without demolition and having to start from scratch. Refurbishment can be a path that, if explored comprehensively and respectfully, can give new life to buildings and contribute positively to the environment. In an extremely challenging context marked by social, economic, and environmental issues, it is possible to discover powerful and aesthetic solutions through innovative approaches that reveal the diverse and dynamic facets of architecture.

For more information about Sto and its solutions, visit their website or browse our product catalog.

Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency - Image 15 of 15
Interior - Filmlageret Community Housing. Image Courtesy of Spacon & X

This article is part of the ArchDaily Topics: Refurbishment, proudly presented by Sto.

Extending the lifespan of buildings reduces cost and environmental impact, avoiding demolition or more substantial interventions in the future. Sto's products for facades, facade refurbishment, crack repair, waterproofing, and concrete restoration systems are used on heritage buildings, adaptive reuse projects, renovations and maintenance of new buildings all over the world. Every month we explore a topic in-depth through articles, interviews, news, and architecture projects. We invite you to learn more about our ArchDaily Topics. And, as always, at ArchDaily we welcome the contributions of our readers; if you want to submit an article or project, contact us.

Image gallery

See allShow less
About this author
Cite: Enrique Tovar. "Refurbishment vs. Demolition: Enhancing Housing for Sustainable Energy Efficiency" 24 Jul 2024. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/1018781/refurbishment-vs-demolition-enhancing-housing-for-sustainable-energy-efficiency> ISSN 0719-8884

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.