State Supreme Court Upholds Architecture's Legal Right to be Ugly

The Supreme Court of Vermont has ruled that architecture is legally allowed to be ugly.

The judgement was made in response to lawsuits filed by Vermont residents against several planned solar developments, claiming that the “unsightliness” of the panels was damaging to their property values.

But the court found that ugliness alone does not qualify as nuisance under state law, citing a long-standing rule barring private lawsuits based solely on aesthetic criticism.

“Property values are affected by many factors; a decrease in market value does not mean there is a nuisance, any more than an increase means there is not,” argued the court in their statement.

Prosecutors had previously argued that the nuisance law was wide-reaching enough to cover the claim, noting the state’s tradition of valuing “scenic resources” in policies including strict anti-billboard  laws.

News via WCAX.

About this author
Cite: Patrick Lynch. "State Supreme Court Upholds Architecture's Legal Right to be Ugly" 16 Jan 2017. ArchDaily. Accessed . <https://www.archdaily.com/803493/state-supreme-court-rules-that-architecture-can-legally-be-ugly> ISSN 0719-8884

© Pixabay user Skeeze. Licensed under CC0 Public Domain

佛蒙特州最高法院认为丑陋的建筑是合理的

You've started following your first account!

Did you know?

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.